<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Full Guide to RAM Speeds: DDR4 2400 vs 2666 vs 3000 vs 3200 vs 3600 vs 4000 MHz	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kaelum Ross		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-4000615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaelum Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-4000615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-4000604&quot;&gt;David Driver&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey David, glad the article helped you out! Of course, these things always depend which is why it&#039;s great you can test, but I expect the 16GB set will have a good chance of giving you a smoother system, best of luck!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-4000604" data-wpel-link="internal">David Driver</a>.</p>
<p>Hey David, glad the article helped you out! Of course, these things always depend which is why it&#8217;s great you can test, but I expect the 16GB set will have a good chance of giving you a smoother system, best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Driver		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-4000604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Driver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 05:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-4000604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article!  I feel a lost more knowledgeable after reading this.  Thank you so much. 

I bought a new Dell Latitude 3520 with i7 and 8G, that has DDR4 SODIMM 3200 MHz chips, but have 2 16G DDR4 2666 MHz chips in a Shuttle that I&#039;m not currently using and was wondering if they would be better or worse.  Since the xG is the biggest factor, I think I&#039;ll give them a try and see how they work. They&#039;re CL19s &#039;tho, which may not be so great.  But if they&#039;re glitchy, I&#039;ll just swap &#039;em out and buy some new ones. 

It&#039;ll be an interesting experiment and hopefully I&#039;ll learn something in the process.   Thanks again for all the great info!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I feel a lost more knowledgeable after reading this.  Thank you so much. </p>
<p>I bought a new Dell Latitude 3520 with i7 and 8G, that has DDR4 SODIMM 3200 MHz chips, but have 2 16G DDR4 2666 MHz chips in a Shuttle that I&#8217;m not currently using and was wondering if they would be better or worse.  Since the xG is the biggest factor, I think I&#8217;ll give them a try and see how they work. They&#8217;re CL19s &#8216;tho, which may not be so great.  But if they&#8217;re glitchy, I&#8217;ll just swap &#8217;em out and buy some new ones. </p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be an interesting experiment and hopefully I&#8217;ll learn something in the process.   Thanks again for all the great info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kaelum Ross		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-3000598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaelum Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 08:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-3000598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-3000597&quot;&gt;Bob&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s a tough question to answer as it depends on usage, your setup, etc. but in general, I would expect the 2 x 8GB to be better for you; getting to use dual-channel RAM is typically going to be more important. I would say that if you ever planned on upgrading, however, running 1 x 16GB and buying a second stick of the same RAM later would also be a good option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-3000597" data-wpel-link="internal">Bob</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tough question to answer as it depends on usage, your setup, etc. but in general, I would expect the 2 x 8GB to be better for you; getting to use dual-channel RAM is typically going to be more important. I would say that if you ever planned on upgrading, however, running 1 x 16GB and buying a second stick of the same RAM later would also be a good option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-3000597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-3000597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s better 2 x 8gb 2400mhz, or 1 x 16gb 3200mhz?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s better 2 x 8gb 2400mhz, or 1 x 16gb 3200mhz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kaelum Ross		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaelum Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 07:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-2000592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000590&quot;&gt;Leo&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Leo, yes, both of your questions are possible, but they&#039;re often not ideal and can sometimes be compatibility issues. If you are using different sticks, they need to be the same voltage and will likely have different speeds, latencies, etc. which can make your build run less efficiently.

To put it simply, there&#039;s a reason RAM is often sold in pairs - &gt; Running the same RAM sticks 2 or 4x (as memory works best dual channel) is really the ideal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000590" data-wpel-link="internal">Leo</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Leo, yes, both of your questions are possible, but they&#8217;re often not ideal and can sometimes be compatibility issues. If you are using different sticks, they need to be the same voltage and will likely have different speeds, latencies, etc. which can make your build run less efficiently.</p>
<p>To put it simply, there&#8217;s a reason RAM is often sold in pairs &#8211; > Running the same RAM sticks 2 or 4x (as memory works best dual channel) is really the ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kaelum Ross		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaelum Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 07:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-2000591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000589&quot;&gt;Andrey&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Andrey, as always with these things it&#039;s hard to give the perfect estimation because it depends dramatically on individual spec versions/games you&#039;re playing, etc. But with that said, I would say that you could &lt;em&gt;roughly &lt;/em&gt; expect ~5% FPS improvement if you were to upgrade to a 4000+ Mhz RAM set (assuming latency/size same as your current set).

Though this will likely be an expensive upgrade; if you&#039;re very price-focussed and JUST interested in gaming, I can&#039;t help but feel like it&#039;ll be more important for you to save up for your desired GPU; as far as iGPUs go, the UHD770 isn&#039;t bad, but the RAM is not going to be bottlenecking your experience anywhere close to the UHD770 is (personal opinion, but I also don&#039;t see GPU prices as much as some expect for some time, so it might be worth putting all of your funds into a dedicated card).

Hope that helps :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000589" data-wpel-link="internal">Andrey</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Andrey, as always with these things it&#8217;s hard to give the perfect estimation because it depends dramatically on individual spec versions/games you&#8217;re playing, etc. But with that said, I would say that you could <em>roughly </em> expect ~5% FPS improvement if you were to upgrade to a 4000+ Mhz RAM set (assuming latency/size same as your current set).</p>
<p>Though this will likely be an expensive upgrade; if you&#8217;re very price-focussed and JUST interested in gaming, I can&#8217;t help but feel like it&#8217;ll be more important for you to save up for your desired GPU; as far as iGPUs go, the UHD770 isn&#8217;t bad, but the RAM is not going to be bottlenecking your experience anywhere close to the UHD770 is (personal opinion, but I also don&#8217;t see GPU prices as much as some expect for some time, so it might be worth putting all of your funds into a dedicated card).</p>
<p>Hope that helps 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leo		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000590</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-2000590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can you, let&#039;s say, use an 8gb and a 4gb stick to get 12gb? Or like 3x4gb or something?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you, let&#8217;s say, use an 8gb and a 4gb stick to get 12gb? Or like 3x4gb or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrey		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 21:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-2000589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi. Thank you for the article. I have question. I have a desktop with core i7 12700k, ddr4 2666. I play the modern games in low quality on the inbuilt graphics cart intel UHD 770. I haven&#039;t wanted to by a discrete video cart yet due to the overprise. I&#039;m waighting for fo the low prise. Should it to exchange the memory on the 4466 Mhz to have a better performance or not? If should, to what extend of frequency be better to change the memory?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Thank you for the article. I have question. I have a desktop with core i7 12700k, ddr4 2666. I play the modern games in low quality on the inbuilt graphics cart intel UHD 770. I haven&#8217;t wanted to by a discrete video cart yet due to the overprise. I&#8217;m waighting for fo the low prise. Should it to exchange the memory on the 4466 Mhz to have a better performance or not? If should, to what extend of frequency be better to change the memory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kaelum		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaelum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 15:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-2000550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000549&quot;&gt;Callum&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re welcome!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000549" data-wpel-link="internal">Callum</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Callum		</title>
		<link>https://whatintech.com/ddr4-2400-vs-2666-vs-3000-vs-3200-vs-3600-vs-4000-mhz/#comment-2000549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Callum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whatintech.com/?p=1962#comment-2000549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really appreciate the detail here thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really appreciate the detail here thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: whatintech.com @ 2026-07-02 10:23:40 by W3 Total Cache
-->